<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LLM on Lucas Boscaini.com</title><link>https://lucasboscaini.com/tags/llm/</link><description>Recent content in LLM on Lucas Boscaini.com</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://lucasboscaini.com/tags/llm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Post-Training Free Task Vectors</title><link>https://lucasboscaini.com/posts/post-training-free-task-vectors/</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://lucasboscaini.com/posts/post-training-free-task-vectors/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="training-free-task-vectors-for-controlling-llm-behavior"&gt;Training-Free Task Vectors for Controlling LLM Behavior&lt;/h1&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I am excited to share our latest research, &lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;Training-Free Task Vectors for LLM Behavioral Control,&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt; which has been accepted at &lt;strong&gt;NeurIPS 2026&lt;/strong&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;In this paper, co-authored with Gabriel J. Perin, Lucas Boscaini, André Araujo, and Nina S. T. Hirata, we tackle a fundamental challenge in post-training model editing: &lt;em&gt;How can we permanently steer LLM behaviors without the heavy computational cost of fine-tuning?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;hr&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="the-problem-the-high-cost-of-classical-task-vectors"&gt;The Problem: The High Cost of Classical Task Vectors&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Task vectors have emerged as a powerful paradigm for model editing. Traditionally, a task vector is constructed by taking the parameter-level difference between a fine-tuned model and its base checkpoint ( $\Delta\theta = \theta_{\text{fine-tuned}} - \theta_{\text{base}}$ ).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>